Athletics realignment of Varsity teams and clubs

Message sent on behalf of Drew Love, Executive Director, Athletics and Recreation

TO: ALL COACHES – LEVEL I, II, CLUBS

            STUDENTS LEADERS

McGill Athletics and Recreation realigns its sports programs

Athletics and Recreation vows to provide students opportunities to participate in sport and physical activity within an inclusive environment that values health, well-being, and fairplay. We strive to instill within our community the values of academic and sporting excellence along with the importance of maintaining an active lifestyle.

Varsity sports is an integral part of this mission, bringing both recognition and a sense of pride to the University. It also serves as an important component of student life for individuals with the skill and desire to play sport at a competitive level.

While McGill has always maintained a philosophy of inclusion, we currently sponsor the greatest number of varsity teams among Canadian universities, supporting a varsity team demands considerable resources, both financial and managerial.

With the current economic climate, university athletic programs across North America are being retooled to reflect the reality of leaner budgets. McGill is no exception. With an estimated cut of $145,000 to the intercollegiate program, McGill’s current varsity structure has been realigned to ensure that we can remain competitive within this new economic reality.

The result is a decision to support excellence within a more limited number of high performance varsity teams while at the same time making funding and resources more broad-based within the next two tiers of varsity teams and non-varsity competitive clubs. To qualify for funding all teams must have a competitive mission and fall within an established set of criteria.

The highlights of this new structure are as follows:

  1.   Greater financial support and better resources for our level one varsity teams who are defined by their high level of competitiveness, degree of spectator and media interest, ability to generate revenue through ticket and concession sales and high profile within the national university sport model (CIS).
    
  2.   A redistribution of funds to our level two varsity teams to better reflect the goals and achievements of this group. This allows for the pursuit of competitive goals but without the extent of support required for athletes competing at the highest of performance levels. Funds will be allocated based on performance and other criteria that foster competitive success.
    
  3.   Competitive clubs now fall under the umbrella of Campus Recreation and are eligible to apply for small annual stipends for start up or other related costs. Funds will be distributed to those clubs who meet the competitive criteria.
    

Level 1 - High Performance Varsity Teams- Fully Funded
(Criteria - must play in a recognized university league with a national championship, hold competitive try outs and have a certified full-time coach, a sustainable organizational structure and alumni support.

Basketball (M/W)
Football (M)
Ice Hockey (M/W)
Soccer (M/W)
Swimming (M/W)
Volleyball (W)

Level 2 - Competitive Varsity Teams - Partially Funded
(Criteria - must compete in a recognized university league with a championship sanctioned by an official university sport governing body, hold competitive tryouts and have a certified coach and a sustainable organizational structure)

Alpine Ski (M/W)
Badminton (M/W)
Baseball (M)
Cross Country (M/W)
Field Hockey (W)
Golf (M/W)
Lacrosse (M)
Rowing (M/W)
Rugby (M/W)
Synchronized Swimming (W)
Track& Field (M/W)
Woodsmen (M/W)

Level 3 - Non-Varsity Competitive Clubs - Self-funded with grants
(Criteria - must play in a recognized competitive league or invitational tournaments, must have a coach (can also be a player) and a sustainable organizational structure)

Cheerleading (M/W)
Curling (M/W)
Cycling (M/W)
Fencing (M/W)
Figure Skating (M/W)
Lacrosse (W)
Nordic Ski (M/W)
Sailing (M/W)
Squash (M/W)
Tennis (M/W)
Ultimate (M/W)
Volleyball (M)

Our men’s volleyball team is only level 3? Ouch.

Is all that’s really keeping us from level II having a certified coach//competitive tryouts and having McGill recognize easterns as a championship?
If the Quebec university cycling circuit gets off the ground would that qualify as a championship sanctioned by an “official university structure”, or would be make one of the races the Quebec/Canadian championship?
//do we still just get $400 for next year?

tribunes article on cuts for next year
http://media.www.mcgilltribune.com/media/storage/paper234/news/2010/02/02/News/Level.Ii.Varsity.Teams.Face.Dramatic.Funding.Cuts.In.201011-3862437.shtml

**or would we make…

wow, the ultimate euphemism if ever i saw one :

“With an estimated cut of $145,000 to the intercollegiate program, McGill’s current varsity structure has been realigned to ensure that we can remain competitive within this new economic reality.”

i.e. to remain competitive, we must cut the budget… A competition towards the bottom.

That’s what has been “realigned”. It almost sounds constructive.

I guess womens volleyball just outperforms mens volleyball year in and year out. one would think the same university leagues/championships exist for both.

McGill has been in an almost hilariously bad downward financial spiral for some time now.

So does this actually impact us?

not really. possibly it means more leeway in our activities. it has more effect on those teams who are moving up or down a category. We are just kind of moving sideways, under a different umbrella.

Any chance we can leverage this to get usage of the school crest, and the MCT name, by our “club” ?

as far as volleyball goes, the women’s circuit has wayyyy more teams and is way more competitive, in the atlantic region there are 10-14 schools that field female volleyball teams while only 3 have mens, i’m guessing this is more or less the same.

ben adler, you should talk to ssmu clubs and services about money, i heard a bunch of clubs didn’t claim their money for this year, maybe they’d be willing to send us a little somethin’, somethin’.

Noted, Drew, thanks for the heads up. Will look into that. @ John: probably this doesn’t afford us any more leverage than we already have, but i don’t think it will force upon us any additional regulations.

what about use of the spin room (and varsity gym)

this is unclear as of now.

worst case we can all bring our trainers to Hons place and do spinning there. I’m sure Hons would be completely fine with that.

true, true.

had no idea there was a woodsmen team at mcgill…also, that its level 2!..haahah…gotta love canada

Dude, Canadian Lumberjack Champions!