Yeah, soap opera is right. We could name it “It’s not about the bike pt 2 - What I Learned from Lance”
Horner, 41 years old and without a team for next year, putting on strong ride after strong ride. Dropping JRod, Valverde… It’s not at all suspicious and makes for perfect daytime television.
the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics: I’m sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. I’m sorry you don’t believe in miracles.
I don’t know if Horner is doping or not, but this missed would be a stupid way to try and evade getting caught
I know at the Tour, the overall leader and stage winner are tested daily (along with other, random samples) I’m assuming the Vuelta does something similar? Either way, they should already have a bunch of samples from Horner, taken closer to the mountain stages.
If you’d been doping this whole time, you know you were going to get tested, and likely have ways of beating the test. There was plenty of time to do whatever it is they do to test clean, no way you need to resort to switching hotels.
It’s sad that Horner and Froome’s presumed guilt has as much or even more media coverage than athletes who are convicted of it, e.g. Jamaican sprinters, baseball, etc.
It’s hard to know what to believe, but I’m going to assume Horner’s win was legitimate because it was terrific. Supporting Horner are the following opinions of mine: uci is incompetent, usada is incompetent, cyclingnews reporters are incompetent, cyclingnews comment section is incompetent